In one of the most damning divorce rulings in recent years, a Family Court judge has ordered a man to pay his former wife £1,000 a month after finding he repeatedly lied about his income, lifestyle, and assets during financial remedy proceedings.

The case – MacQueen v MacQueen, heard by District Judge Ashby in February 2024 – has gained national attention not only for the outcome but for the stark warning it sends about financial dishonesty during divorce.

What Happened?

The couple separated in June 2021. Both had been previously declared bankrupt and owned no property at the time of their divorce. However, the court heard that:

• The husband continued to run a lucrative bulldog breeding business

• He enjoyed luxury holidays, designer goods, and a lifestyle that did not match his declared income

• He failed to provide key financial records, including tax documentation and proof of income

Judge Ashby called his sworn financial statement “a fairytale, bearing absolutely no resemblance to the truth.”

The Court’s View: “Brazen Lies”

In the judgment, Judge Ashby stated:

“Rarely have I encountered a situation where such continuous brazen lies have been pursued before the court in this kind of manner. The husband has shown absolutely no respect for the authority of the court or this process.”

Despite this, the court did not award a lump sum, as there were no significant matrimonial assets. However, it did order ongoing spousal maintenance of:

• £1,000 per month,

• Index-linked to inflation,

• Payable until the youngest child turns 18 or finishes full-time education (up to age 21)

The judge also calculated that the husband’s true income was likely at least £150,000 per year, despite attempts to conceal this.

Key Takeaways: What This Means for Your Divorce

1. Financial Honesty Is Crucial

Failing to disclose assets, underreporting income, or refusing to provide financial documents can backfire badly. Judges have wide powers to make inferences and impose sanctions.

2. The Court Can Still Order Maintenance Without Assets

Even without property or savings, ongoing spousal maintenance can be ordered if there’s a significant income gap — especially when children are involved.

3. Dishonesty Has Consequences

The husband was ordered to pay all of the wife’s legal costs — a rare and severe penalty that reflects the seriousness of misleading the court.

4. Accurate Form E Disclosures Are Essential

Form E (the court’s financial disclosure form) must be completed truthfully and thoroughly. Any falsehoods could lead to court sanctions and damage your case.

What if Your Ex Is Hiding Money?

If you suspect your ex-spouse is hiding assets or underreporting income, you can:

• Request full disclosure through the court

• Apply for a financial remedy order

• Seek legal advice immediately

Judges can draw adverse inferences and base awards on estimated income if full disclosure isn’t provided.

Final Thoughts

This case sends a powerful message: the Family Court takes financial honesty seriously. Spouses trying to mislead the system risk severe financial consequences, reputational damage, and unfavourable judgments.

Whether you are negotiating a financial settlement or suspect foul play in your divorce, having the right legal team can make all the difference.